- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:28:09 +0100
- To: '☮ elf Pavlik ☮' <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Renato Iannella'" <ri@semanticidentity.com>
On 30 Okt 2014 at 20:21, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > On 10/30/2014 08:13 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> On 28 Okt 2014 at 01:36, Renato Iannella wrote: >>> >>>> On 24 Oct 2014, at 22:59, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Now that has technical consequences... namely more HTTP requests, lower >>>> cache-hit rates, etc. What's the reasoning behind your suggestion to use >>>> distinct resources instead of fragment identifiers? >>> >>> There are always tradeoffs between the two approaches: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp- vocab-pub/ >> >> Right. I was actually interested what you tried to optimize for when you >> suggested to use paths instead of fragment identifiers. I suggested to use >> fragment identifiers because I expect the vocabulary to be (and remain) >> quite small and I wanted to minimize the number of necessary HTTP requests. > > FYI > > http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2014-10-27/line/1414433862098 > > RESOLVED: adoption of "http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#" as > namespace for Activity Streams 2.0 Great, thanks Pavlik. Haven't read the minutes yet... just catching up with my mails while waiting for a plane :-) Have a nice evening, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2014 19:28:43 UTC