W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > October 2014

RE: Activity Streams URI Namespace

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:28:09 +0100
To: '☮ elf Pavlik ☮' <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Cc: "'Renato Iannella'" <ri@semanticidentity.com>
Message-ID: <023d01cff477$a43cd750$ecb685f0$@gmx.net>
On 30 Okt 2014 at 20:21, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 08:13 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>> On 28 Okt 2014 at 01:36, Renato Iannella wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 24 Oct 2014, at 22:59, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Now that has technical consequences... namely more HTTP requests, lower
>>>> cache-hit rates, etc. What's the reasoning behind your suggestion to use
>>>> distinct resources instead of fragment identifiers?
>>> 
>>> There are always tradeoffs between the two approaches:
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp- vocab-pub/
>> 
>> Right. I was actually interested what you tried to optimize for when you
>> suggested to use paths instead of fragment identifiers. I suggested to use
>> fragment identifiers because I expect the vocabulary to be (and remain)
>> quite small and I wanted to minimize the number of necessary HTTP requests.
> 
> FYI
> 
> http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2014-10-27/line/1414433862098
> 
> RESOLVED: adoption of "http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#" as
> namespace for Activity Streams 2.0

Great, thanks Pavlik. Haven't read the minutes yet... just catching up with my mails while waiting for a plane :-)


Have a nice evening,
Markus


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2014 19:28:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:13 UTC