- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:13:19 +0100
- To: <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Renato Iannella'" <ri@semanticidentity.com>
On 28 Okt 2014 at 01:36, Renato Iannella wrote: > >> On 24 Oct 2014, at 22:59, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: >> >> Now that has technical consequences... namely more HTTP requests, lower >> cache-hit rates, etc. What's the reasoning behind your suggestion to use >> distinct resources instead of fragment identifiers? > > There are always tradeoffs between the two approaches: > http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp- vocab-pub/ Right. I was actually interested what you tried to optimize for when you suggested to use paths instead of fragment identifiers. I suggested to use fragment identifiers because I expect the vocabulary to be (and remain) quite small and I wanted to minimize the number of necessary HTTP requests. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2014 19:13:49 UTC