Re: Activity Streams 1.0 basic schema verbs and object types supported by

On 2014-11-03 01:50 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> I would still like to clarify reasons of not reusing for that
> purpose.
I don't think we start off with the assumption that we're going to use 
one or the other solution (in particular, /your preferred solution/) and 
then other people have to disprove it.

In particular, since this isn't the solution that's been used in 
previous versions of Activity Streams, it seems unlikely that we'd start 
with it as a default.

We also don't use other parts of in our system, so it'd be a 
big step. Maybe you'd like to make the case for it at one of our 
upcoming meetings?


Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 19:08:23 UTC