public-soap-jms@w3.org from July 2009 by date

Friday, 31 July 2009

• IBM approval for use of trust 2902 URI Mark Phillips

Wednesday, 29 July 2009

• ISSUE-8 (Incorrect example, section C2): Example in C2 contrary to Protocol-2029 [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• Action item 95 complete Eric Johnson
• NEW ISSUE: Incorrect example, section C2 Eric Johnson
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2041 is spurious Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-7 (Protocol-2041 is spurious): Protocol-2041 is spurious [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2041 is spurious Eric Johnson

Tuesday, 28 July 2009

• ISSUE-6 (Protocol 2039 redundant): Protocol 2039 redundant, missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Action 94: Revised proposal for requestURI testable assertions Eric Johnson
• Minutes 2009-07-28 Mark Phillips
• Action 94: Revised proposal for requestURI testable assertions Mark Phillips
• RE: Agenda for 2009-07-28 conference call Peter Easton

Monday, 27 July 2009

• NEW ISSUE: Protocol 2039 redundant, missing RFC 2119 language Eric Johnson
• Agenda for 2009-07-28 conference call Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-5 (Protocol-2035 is redundant): Protocol-2035 is redundant [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• NEW ISSUE: Protocol 2035 is redundant Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-4 (Protocol-2024 needs restructuring): Protocol-2024 does not include RFC-2119 language, has large associated table SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• NEW ISSUE: Protocol-2024 does not include RFC-2119 language, has large associated table Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-3 (Protocol-2023 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2023 missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2023 missing RFC 2119 Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-2 (Protocol-2020 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2020 missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2020 missing RFC 2119 language Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-1 (Assert Protocol-2013 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2013 is missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• action item: frequently-asked questions review and additions Amelia A Lewis

Saturday, 25 July 2009

• NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2013 is missing RFC 2119 language Eric Johnson

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

• Updates to FAQ wiki page Eric Johnson
• Minutes 2009-07-21 Mark Phillips
• Action 92: "Propose the wording for the change to split 2024 into three testable assertions" Mark Phillips
• Regrets 7/21/9 Peter Easton
• Re: Proposed questions for our FAQ Mark Phillips
• Proposed questions for our FAQ Eric Johnson
• Agenda for 2009-07-21 conference call Eric Johnson

Saturday, 18 July 2009

• Call for Submissions for 3rd International Rules Challenge Yuh-Jong Hu

Friday, 17 July 2009

• This is out of scope of our charter, but what about UDDI? Eric Johnson

Tuesday, 14 July 2009

• Re: ACTION-90 Follow up contacts with CXF to find out timeframes etc Peter Easton
• Minutes 2009-07-14 Mark Phillips
• Re: Agenda for 2009-07-14 conference call Yves Lafon

Monday, 13 July 2009

• Agenda for 2009-07-14 conference call Eric Johnson

Tuesday, 7 July 2009

• Reminder: no meeting on July 7 Eric Johnson

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

• Typo/mistake in the CR for SOAP-JMS Eric Johnson
• Updated JMS URI draft Eric Johnson

Last message date: Friday, 31 July 2009 17:33:26 UTC