- From: Michel_Dumontier <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:16:22 -0400
- To: "obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net" <obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
There are two issues I'd like to raise to our communities: 1 - What metrics should we use to assess ontology quality and determine whether an ontology is "good". 2 - Can we re-factor existing, and well used terminologies (SNOMED-CT, NCI-T, ICD) into "good" ontologies for health care and the life sciences? m. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Hogan [mailto:hoganwr@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 11:57 AM > To: obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Obo-discuss] Ontological Realism and OBO Foundry Criteria > > We don't have _good_ ontologies for basic electronic medical record > "stuff", like diseases, hypersensitivity conditions (although I made a > start), medications, procedures, laboratory tests (again, work started > but still woefully incomplete, even without hitting any hard cases), > etc. > > > Bill >
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 16:17:18 UTC