- From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:05:42 +0100
- To: Mark Wilkinson <markw@illuminae.com>
- CC: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Mark Wilkinson wrote: > > "A user who places the identifier in the location bar of a web browser > should get back useful information about the identified concept or > object." > > Why? It seems an awfully steep barrier-to-entry to have *all* URI's > resolve to a web page as well as to whatever the URI actually > represents, especially when my agent can't read... Well, first, if a URI is not resolved something, the purpose of using web is lost. Second, a URI is not resolved to a "web page," rather it is resolved to a representation, which can happen to be an HTML document (a web page, I guess) of the resource that the URI denotes. Third, an agent may not read "natural language" but should be able to read "something", such as XML or RDF or even a binary file, yes? This is what Jonathan's document intends to say - "useful information". Xiaoshu > > Mark > > > > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:01:17 -0700, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> > wrote: > >> * Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> [2008-04-25 13:08-0400] >>> >>> I've been posting revisions to the URI note to the same location: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/uris/ >>> >>> If you're planning on attending the next HCLS meeting/telecon (Monday?) >>> please take a look as the meeting approaches. Otherwise, comments are >>> welcome, but I suggest you read it now only if you also plan on >>> reading a >>> later draft, as significantly more work will be done on it over the >>> next >>> few days. >> >> I've started a QuickTips summary of this and cool-uris. It is very >> direct >> about endorsing HTTP URIs. Attached here for consideration. >> >>> Jonathan >>> >>> On Apr 20, 2008, at 5:57 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote: >>> >>>> Some of you may have heard that the URI note has been revised since >>>> the last public draft last October. This is indeed the case, and its >>>> authors are working on polishing the new version. If you would like >>>> to examine a snapshot of our work it is available here: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/uris/ >>>> >>>> It's still in a state of high flux so we're can't promise to act on or >>>> even respond to comments right now. We plan to give you further >>>> drafts >>>> for review over the coming week and after. >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Jonathan >> > > >
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 20:06:30 UTC