- From: Stian Soiland <ssoiland@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:29:01 +0100
- To: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
On 16 Jul 2007, at 10:16, Eric Jain wrote: > The Link header sounds like a good idea (never heard of that > before), but at the moment it seems simpler for someone who wants > to get only RDF documents to set an Accept header. This will also > ensure that you are not redirected (and waste a request) for a > resource that doesn't even have RDF. There is no reason to not support both. The Link header can be useful information for a browser that is not RDF aware, but know of some application that is. It would not normally involve this application to try different content type, but if the resource can list other representations it could put up a nice little button. -- Stian Soiland, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~ssoiland/
Received on Monday, 16 July 2007 11:48:45 UTC