- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:43:45 +0200
- To: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: "'Matthias Samwald'" <samwald@gmx.at>, "'M. Scott Marshall'" <marshall@science.uva.nl>, "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, wangxiao@musc.edu, "'Michel_Dumontier'" <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>, "'public-semweb-lifesci'" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "'Mark Wilkinson'" <markw@illuminae.com>, "'Benjamin Good'" <goodb@interchange.ubc.ca>, "'Natalia Villanueva Rosales'" <naty.vr@gmail.com>
Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > I am not sure whether the following issue has already been discussed. > By using the identifiers to also locate where the RDFs statements describing > the resource in question are, don’t we somehow dictate where the document(s) > containing the RDFs statements describing a given resource are to be > located? Not dictating anything, just providing some useful default behavior. If you prefer to resolve http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/P12345 to let's say http://www.ebi.uniprot.org/entry/P12345, you can do so in your application.
Received on Monday, 16 July 2007 11:44:23 UTC