Re: Review: New charter

On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 10:12 +0000, Little, Chris wrote:
> Linda, Ted,
> 
> Would a global change,  'Interest' -> 'Working', plus a few grammar
> tweaks, do it?

Mostly, I think some of the wording is too exploratory and Interest
Group like whereas Working Groups are more focused on set of
deliverables. 

We have a six month extension for the Interest Group. We may be working
with OGC and others on a routing ontology and would like to see if that
gets going and should be included in Working Group charter as a
concrete spec for W3C Recommendations Track. Also I hope in May AC
meeting we will have a clear answer on Ever-teal (evergreen)
specifications at W3C that demonstrate maturity but are expected to
receive ongoing modifications as that makes sense for ontology work.

-----Original Message-----
> From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> 
> Sent: 01 April 2020 09:13
> To: ted@w3.org; public-sdwig@w3.org
> Cc: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> Subject: RE: Review: New charter
> 
> I would prefer that!
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> Verzonden: dinsdag 31 maart 2020 14:36
> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; 
> public-sdwig@w3.org
> CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <
> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> 
> It can pursue other interests and recharter if those mature for
> formal standards development.
> 
> On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 06:39 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> > I think it does make sense. The SSN and OWL-Time errata and
> > extensions 
> > are better at home in a WG, at least.
> > 
> > I'm hesitant to have an IG as well, running two groups might mean
> > more 
> > overhead... Couldn't the WG be scoped to manage the other interests
> > as 
> > well, besides the concrete deliverables?
> > 
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> > Verzonden: maandag 30 maart 2020 17:15
> > Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; 
> > public-sdwig@w3.org
> > CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) < 
> > jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> > Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > W3C Management is encouraging us to draft a charter for a Working 
> > Group given the amount of work on REC track. A question is whether
> > to 
> > also have an Interest Group given the number of well, interests 
> > besides what we can presently list as deliverables.
> > 
> > What are others' thoughts?
> > 
> > On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 12:59 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >  
> > > I updated the charter today (finally…) and resolved all the 
> > > comments.
> > >  
> > > I believe the charter as it is now formulated at 
> > > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html can go ahead 
> > > through the W3C approval process. @ted@w3.org, what’s the next
> > > step 
> > > for that?
> > >  
> > > I confirmed with Scott Simmons that at the OGC side, nothing
> > > needs 
> > > to be done in this case.
> > >  
> > > Linda
> > >  
> > > Van: Rob Smith <rob.smith@awayteam.co.uk>
> > > Verzonden: donderdag 27 februari 2020 14:01
> > > Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> > > CC: public-sdwig@w3.org; ted@w3.org; Jeremy Tandy (
> > > jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> > > Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> > >  
> > > Linda,
> > >  
> > > Apologies the delay in replying.
> > >  
> > > Yes, I think it would be beneficial to include a WebVMT Note 
> > > deliverable in the new charter. There are a number of items 
> > > currently incubating for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, and 
> > > publishing a Note subsequently would be a good aim.
> > >  
> > > The groups for WebVMT coordination at W3C are the Media Timed
> > > Events 
> > > Task Force [1], which is part of the Media & Entertainment IG,
> > > and 
> > > WICG DataCue [2] for video metadata. I’m unsure of MTE TF
> > > charter 
> > > status, but will confirm with Chris Needham and let you know. I
> > > can 
> > > also confirm that the relevant OGC groups are ARML for camera, 
> > > Moving Features for interpolation and Sensor Things for data
> > > sync, 
> > > which are already included in the current charter. The other 
> > > possible connection is OGC Geopose [3], again for camera.
> > >  
> > > Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any
> > > further 
> > > details.
> > >  
> > > Rob Smith
> > >  
> > > Away Team
> > > www.awayteam.co.uk
> > >  
> > > [1]
> > > 
https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Media_Timed_Events_TF
> > > [2] https://github.com/WICG/datacue/ [3] 
> > > https://www.ogc.org/projects/groups/geoposeswg
> > >  
> > > > On 18 Feb 2020, at 10:54, Linda van den Brink < 
> > > > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > Dear SDWIG members,
> > > >  
> > > > Ted and I have been working on the charter renewal for our
> > > > group.
> > > > We would like the charter’s start date to be 1 April 2020
> > > > (which 
> > > > is a bit ambitious, but let’s go for it). Please send in your 
> > > > comments within two weeks as a reply to this email. We will
> > > > also 
> > > > consider pull requests.
> > > >  
> > > > I have a specific question for @Rob Smith;
> > > >  
> > > > Do you want the charter to mention a Note about WebVMT as a 
> > > > specific work item, and/or to add the web media text tracks 
> > > > community group to the list of W3C groups to coordinate with?
> > > >  
> > > > @all: Please let us know if any other work item should be 
> > > > mentioned explicitly.
> > > >  
> > > > The draft charter is at: 
> > > > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html
> > > >  
> > > > Linda
> > > 
> > >  
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Away Team
> > > www.awayteam.co.uk
> > >  
> > 
> > --
> > Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> > W3C Automotive Lead
> > https://www.w3.org/auto
> > 
> 
> --
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Automotive Lead
> https://www.w3.org/auto
> 
-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
https://www.w3.org/auto