W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdwig@w3.org > April 2020

RE: Review: New charter

From: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:12:01 +0000
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, "ted@w3.org" <ted@w3.org>, "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>
CC: "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
Message-ID: <CWXP265MB00539596FAA5E999A200B3DCA7C90@CWXP265MB0053.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Linda, Ted,

Would a global change,  'Interest' -> 'Working', plus a few grammar tweaks, do it?

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> 
Sent: 01 April 2020 09:13
To: ted@w3.org; public-sdwig@w3.org
Cc: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
Subject: RE: Review: New charter

I would prefer that!

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
Verzonden: dinsdag 31 maart 2020 14:36
Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; public-sdwig@w3.org
CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter

It can pursue other interests and recharter if those mature for formal standards development.

On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 06:39 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> I think it does make sense. The SSN and OWL-Time errata and extensions 
> are better at home in a WG, at least.
> 
> I'm hesitant to have an IG as well, running two groups might mean more 
> overhead... Couldn't the WG be scoped to manage the other interests as 
> well, besides the concrete deliverables?
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> Verzonden: maandag 30 maart 2020 17:15
> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; 
> public-sdwig@w3.org
> CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) < 
> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> W3C Management is encouraging us to draft a charter for a Working 
> Group given the amount of work on REC track. A question is whether to 
> also have an Interest Group given the number of well, interests 
> besides what we can presently list as deliverables.
> 
> What are others' thoughts?
> 
> On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 12:59 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >  
> > I updated the charter today (finally…) and resolved all the 
> > comments.
> >  
> > I believe the charter as it is now formulated at 
> > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html can go ahead 
> > through the W3C approval process. @ted@w3.org, what’s the next step 
> > for that?
> >  
> > I confirmed with Scott Simmons that at the OGC side, nothing needs 
> > to be done in this case.
> >  
> > Linda
> >  
> > Van: Rob Smith <rob.smith@awayteam.co.uk>
> > Verzonden: donderdag 27 februari 2020 14:01
> > Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> > CC: public-sdwig@w3.org; ted@w3.org; Jeremy Tandy (
> > jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> > Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> >  
> > Linda,
> >  
> > Apologies the delay in replying.
> >  
> > Yes, I think it would be beneficial to include a WebVMT Note 
> > deliverable in the new charter. There are a number of items 
> > currently incubating for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, and 
> > publishing a Note subsequently would be a good aim.
> >  
> > The groups for WebVMT coordination at W3C are the Media Timed Events 
> > Task Force [1], which is part of the Media & Entertainment IG, and 
> > WICG DataCue [2] for video metadata. I’m unsure of MTE TF charter 
> > status, but will confirm with Chris Needham and let you know. I can 
> > also confirm that the relevant OGC groups are ARML for camera, 
> > Moving Features for interpolation and Sensor Things for data sync, 
> > which are already included in the current charter. The other 
> > possible connection is OGC Geopose [3], again for camera.
> >  
> > Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any further 
> > details.
> >  
> > Rob Smith
> >  
> > Away Team
> > www.awayteam.co.uk
> >  
> > [1]
> > https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Media_Timed_Events_TF

> > [2] https://github.com/WICG/datacue/ [3] 
> > https://www.ogc.org/projects/groups/geoposeswg

> >  
> > > On 18 Feb 2020, at 10:54, Linda van den Brink < 
> > > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
> > >  
> > > Dear SDWIG members,
> > >  
> > > Ted and I have been working on the charter renewal for our group.
> > > We would like the charter’s start date to be 1 April 2020 (which 
> > > is a bit ambitious, but let’s go for it). Please send in your 
> > > comments within two weeks as a reply to this email. We will also 
> > > consider pull requests.
> > >  
> > > I have a specific question for @Rob Smith;
> > >  
> > > Do you want the charter to mention a Note about WebVMT as a 
> > > specific work item, and/or to add the web media text tracks 
> > > community group to the list of W3C groups to coordinate with?
> > >  
> > > @all: Please let us know if any other work item should be 
> > > mentioned explicitly.
> > >  
> > > The draft charter is at: 
> > > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html

> > >  
> > > Linda
> > 
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > Away Team
> > www.awayteam.co.uk
> >  
> 
> --
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Automotive Lead
> https://www.w3.org/auto

> 
--
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
https://www.w3.org/auto


Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2020 10:12:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 1 April 2020 10:12:22 UTC