W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdwig@w3.org > April 2020

Re: Review: New charter

From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:09:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMTVsu=hY-Q2dYgdZ9eBmU9aphZMQ2wF9tY+JUTXAhjmN9J9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Cc: "ted@w3.org" <ted@w3.org>, "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>, "Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk)" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
Hi Linda and Ted

Sorry for slow response to this but just to note my support for
re-chartering and happy with the idea of a WG rather than IG.  I've been
overly busy on other things recently hence my general quietness on the
mailing list, but intend to participate in the rechartered group, with
interest mainly in the SDWBP maintenance and potentially geosparql

Best regards

Bill


On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 07:40, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> I think it does make sense. The SSN and OWL-Time errata and extensions are
> better at home in a WG, at least.
>
> I'm hesitant to have an IG as well, running two groups might mean more
> overhead... Couldn't the WG be scoped to manage the other interests as
> well, besides the concrete deliverables?
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> Verzonden: maandag 30 maart 2020 17:15
> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; public-sdwig@w3.org
> CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <
> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
>
> Hi all,
>
> W3C Management is encouraging us to draft a charter for a Working Group
> given the amount of work on REC track. A question is whether to also have
> an Interest Group given the number of well, interests besides what we can
> presently list as deliverables.
>
> What are others' thoughts?
>
> On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 12:59 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I updated the charter today (finally…) and resolved all the comments.
> >
> > I believe the charter as it is now formulated at
> > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html can go ahead
> > through the W3C approval process. @ted@w3.org, what’s the next step
> > for that?
> >
> > I confirmed with Scott Simmons that at the OGC side, nothing needs to
> > be done in this case.
> >
> > Linda
> >
> > Van: Rob Smith <rob.smith@awayteam.co.uk>
> > Verzonden: donderdag 27 februari 2020 14:01
> > Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> > CC: public-sdwig@w3.org; ted@w3.org; Jeremy Tandy (
> > jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> > Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> >
> > Linda,
> >
> > Apologies the delay in replying.
> >
> > Yes, I think it would be beneficial to include a WebVMT Note
> > deliverable in the new charter. There are a number of items currently
> > incubating for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, and publishing a Note
> > subsequently would be a good aim.
> >
> > The groups for WebVMT coordination at W3C are the Media Timed Events
> > Task Force [1], which is part of the Media & Entertainment IG, and
> > WICG DataCue [2] for video metadata. I’m unsure of MTE TF charter
> > status, but will confirm with Chris Needham and let you know. I can
> > also confirm that the relevant OGC groups are ARML for camera, Moving
> > Features for interpolation and Sensor Things for data sync, which are
> > already included in the current charter. The other possible connection
> > is OGC Geopose [3], again for camera.
> >
> > Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any further
> > details.
> >
> > Rob Smith
> >
> > Away Team
> > www.awayteam.co.uk
> >
> > [1]
> > https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Media_Timed_Events_TF
> > [2] https://github.com/WICG/datacue/
> > [3] https://www.ogc.org/projects/groups/geoposeswg
> >
> > > On 18 Feb 2020, at 10:54, Linda van den Brink <
> > > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear SDWIG members,
> > >
> > > Ted and I have been working on the charter renewal for our group.
> > > We would like the charter’s start date to be 1 April 2020 (which is
> > > a bit ambitious, but let’s go for it). Please send in your comments
> > > within two weeks as a reply to this email. We will also consider
> > > pull requests.
> > >
> > > I have a specific question for @Rob Smith;
> > >
> > > Do you want the charter to mention a Note about WebVMT as a specific
> > > work item, and/or to add the web media text tracks community group
> > > to the list of W3C groups to coordinate with?
> > >
> > > @all: Please let us know if any other work item should be mentioned
> > > explicitly.
> > >
> > > The draft charter is at:
> > > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html
> > >
> > > Linda
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Away Team
> > www.awayteam.co.uk
> >
> --
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Automotive Lead
> https://www.w3.org/auto
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2020 16:09:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 14 April 2020 16:09:34 UTC