W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2017

RE: Time Ontology - adjust CR exit criteria

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 21:04:18 +0000
To: <fd@w3.org>, <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
CC: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57105f397a69453e8a3c015d981d6db7@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
Seems fair enough on the surface, though not quite so sure in practice. 

I guess 'producer implementation' is intended to mean some kind of service that publishes using OWL-Time, and 'consumer implementation' some application that is consuming data published using OWL-Time? In a linked-data/restful context is a resource that mentions some other resource which, when de-referenced, mentions OWL-Time resources, a "consumer implementation"? 


-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, 1 June, 2017 01:08
To: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>; chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk
Cc: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: Time Ontology - adjust CR exit criteria

Simon, Chris, Time Ontology enthusiasts,

The Director recommends to amend the first sub-bullet of bullet 3 of the CR exit criteria to mention both producers and consumers of the ontology, from "Demonstrated use in two external implementations" to "Demonstrated use in at least two producer implementations and two consumer implementations". Would that be ok with you?


Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 21:06:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 May 2017 21:06:37 UTC