W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2017

RE: SDW BP Glossary Meta-issue

From: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 16:23:05 +0000
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
CC: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Message-ID: <3DAD8A5A545D7644A066C4F2E82072883E2CBA32@EXXCMPD1DAG4.cmpd1.metoffice.gov.uk>
Hi Linda,

I'm happy to keep those links. The CSIRO site is webbier and direct to the definition, even if not the authoritative owner. 

Let us keep both the CSIRO and TC211 Spreadsheet links - in some of my emails I gave a more comprehensive link text.

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda van den Brink [mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 10:44 AM
> To: Linda van den Brink; Little, Chris; Svensson, Lars; Phil Archer
> Cc: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Tandy, Jeremy; Simon.Cox@csiro.au
> Subject: RE: SDW BP Glossary Meta-issue
> 
> Also, I kept the references to the TC211 glossary hosted at CSIRO. If
> this is not appropriate please let me know so I can remove these, or
> provide a PR doing so.
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Linda van den Brink [mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 5 mei 2017 10:51
> Aan: Little, Chris; Svensson, Lars; Phil Archer
> CC: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Tandy, Jeremy; Simon.Cox@csiro.au
> Onderwerp: RE: SDW BP Glossary Meta-issue
> 
> For now, I will link to the persistent URI of the current version of
> Wikipedia articles, to be on the safe side.
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Little, Chris [mailto:chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk]
> Verzonden: donderdag 4 mei 2017 18:45
> Aan: Svensson, Lars; Phil Archer
> CC: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Linda van den Brink; Tandy, Jeremy;
> Simon.Cox@csiro.au
> Onderwerp: RE: SDW BP Glossary Meta-issue
> 
> Lars,
> 
> Thank you for a good point.
> 
> Maybe we should be guided by the W3C policy? If they have one.
> 
> Chris
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Svensson, Lars [mailto:L.Svensson@dnb.de]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2017 5:16 PM
> > To: Little, Chris
> > Cc: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Linda van den Brink; Tandy, Jeremy;
> > Simon.Cox@csiro.au
> > Subject: RE: SDW BP Glossary Meta-issue
> >
> > Hello Chris, all,
> >
> > On Thursday, May 04, 2017 4:55 PM, Little, Chris
> > [mailto:chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk] wrote:
> >
> > > As I work through the highlighted issues in the Glossary, I have
> > > been using a limited number of online resources:
> > >
> > > 1. Wikipedia articles. These have reasonably persistent URLs to
> > > human
> > readable pages.
> >
> > A meta-meta-issue: Do we cite the Wikipedia article using the
> "general"
> > URL (e. g. [1]) or do we cite a specific version of the article (e.
> g.
> > [2])? The latter is generally considered the better practice since
> the
> > article contents might change and the cited text might not be
> > contained any more (although that is probably not the case for this
> > kind of information).
> >
> > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash

> > [2]
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geohash&oldid=773640793

> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Lars

Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 16:23:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 5 May 2017 16:23:41 UTC