- From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 09:44:29 +0000
- To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org>
- CC: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Also, I kept the references to the TC211 glossary hosted at CSIRO. If this is not appropriate please let me know so I can remove these, or provide a PR doing so. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Linda van den Brink [mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl] Verzonden: vrijdag 5 mei 2017 10:51 Aan: Little, Chris; Svensson, Lars; Phil Archer CC: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Tandy, Jeremy; Simon.Cox@csiro.au Onderwerp: RE: SDW BP Glossary Meta-issue For now, I will link to the persistent URI of the current version of Wikipedia articles, to be on the safe side. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Little, Chris [mailto:chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk] Verzonden: donderdag 4 mei 2017 18:45 Aan: Svensson, Lars; Phil Archer CC: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Linda van den Brink; Tandy, Jeremy; Simon.Cox@csiro.au Onderwerp: RE: SDW BP Glossary Meta-issue Lars, Thank you for a good point. Maybe we should be guided by the W3C policy? If they have one. Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Svensson, Lars [mailto:L.Svensson@dnb.de] > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2017 5:16 PM > To: Little, Chris > Cc: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Linda van den Brink; Tandy, Jeremy; > Simon.Cox@csiro.au > Subject: RE: SDW BP Glossary Meta-issue > > Hello Chris, all, > > On Thursday, May 04, 2017 4:55 PM, Little, Chris > [mailto:chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk] wrote: > > > As I work through the highlighted issues in the Glossary, I have > > been using a limited number of online resources: > > > > 1. Wikipedia articles. These have reasonably persistent URLs to > > human > readable pages. > > A meta-meta-issue: Do we cite the Wikipedia article using the "general" > URL (e. g. [1]) or do we cite a specific version of the article (e. g. > [2])? The latter is generally considered the better practice since the > article contents might change and the cited text might not be > contained any more (although that is probably not the case for this > kind of information). > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geohash&oldid=773640793 > > Best, > > Lars
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 09:45:02 UTC