- From: <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 17:57:31 +0000
- To: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- CC: <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Dear all, The note about axis order in WKT is now included in the ED (thanks, Linda): http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#bp-crs It's the last note under point #3. For your convenience, I include it below: [[ It is worth noting that, in the [SIMPLE-FEATURES] definition of WKT, the coordinate axis-order is by default longitude / latitude, irrespective of the coordinate reference system used. The same applies to EWKT (Extended WKT) - a PostGIS extension to WKT supported also by other GIS tools -, which includes a parameter (SRID) for specifying the coordinate reference system. For this reason, whenever using WKT to encode geometries, it is important that the reference WKT specification can be unambiguously determined. ]] Could you please have a check, and verify whether you think it's correct / accurate enough? If this is not the case, please propose revised text. In particular, I would like to ask your feedback on the last sentence: [[ For this reason, whenever using WKT to encode geometries, it is important that the reference WKT specification can be unambiguously determined. ]] Ideally, this text needs to be extended to provide guidance on how to make it unambiguous which is the WKT "flavour" used. When using RDF + GeoSPARQL's WKT, datatype geosparql:wktLiteral does the job. But what about other WKT flavours? And what to do when not using an RDF representation? Thanks In advance Andrea ---- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. ________________________________________ From: PEREGO Andrea (JRC-ISPRA) Sent: 01 May 2017 00:08 To: Jeremy Tandy; Linda van den Brink Cc: SDW WG Public List Subject: BP8: Note about axis order in WKT Jeremy, Linda, As agreed, I've prepared a draft note for BP8 about how axis order is used in (the different flavours of) WKT. The relevant pull request (including also a number of editorial changes mainly on Section 12.2.1 and Appendix A): https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/769 Thanks Andrea ---- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 17:58:04 UTC