- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 01:19:32 +0100
- To: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
- Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2017 00:20:05 UTC
I'd be happy to explore that, but it would be good to have some (even informal) encouragement from the SDW WG that this would be a welcome development. We did something similar with a DCAT-based Dataset design a while ago and it seems that we inadvertently caused some frustration as it was seen as a fork. It would be a pity to try to adopt a design based on SOSA (or SOSA/SSN) and for that to be seen in a similar way. Do you think the WG would welcome such an effort? Dan On 7 June 2017 at 00:37, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > > SSN http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/ is now in rec-track and we are to > collect implementation evidences in the next 4 weeks. In fact, we need to > show demonstrated use in at least two producer implementations and two > consumer implementations, with producer implementations, according to our > interpretation of the Director’s words meaning that there needs to be two > ontologies that extend each term of SOSA/SSN. > > > > You indicated earlier in the working group that you would likely take the > simple SOSA core and integrate all or parts of it in Schema.org. Would that > be something you could kick off in the next 4 weeks with maybe a Change > request to schema.org? > > > > Cheers, > Armin > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2017 00:20:05 UTC