W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > June 2017

Re: Implementation evidence - Producers

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 01:19:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=6LrfFWTmSWx6oXdFQrhmg5hynvtm0hVzsb+p_Oa1OBNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
I'd be happy to explore that, but it would be good to have some (even
informal) encouragement from the SDW WG that this would be a welcome
development. We did something similar with a DCAT-based Dataset design a
while ago and it seems that we inadvertently caused some frustration as it
was seen as a fork. It would be a pity to try to adopt a design based on
SOSA (or SOSA/SSN) and for that to be seen in a similar way. Do you think
the WG would welcome such an effort?


On 7 June 2017 at 00:37, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
> SSN http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/ is now in rec-track and we are to
> collect implementation evidences in the next 4 weeks. In fact, we need to
> show demonstrated use in at least two producer implementations and two
> consumer implementations, with producer implementations, according to our
> interpretation of the Director’s words meaning that there needs to be two
> ontologies that extend each term of SOSA/SSN.
> You indicated earlier in the working group that you would likely take the
> simple SOSA core and integrate all or parts of it in Schema.org. Would that
> be something you could kick off in the next 4 weeks with maybe a Change
> request to schema.org?
> Cheers,
> Armin
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2017 00:20:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:33 UTC