- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:14:05 -0700
- To: "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <28c2181e-44fd-b872-3f17-526a76615615@ucsb.edu>
On 04/05/2017 09:45 AM, Little, Chris wrote: > > Dear Ontologists and SDW Chairs, > > I am not sure that the multi-choice questions reflect my opinions. My > single transferable vote is: > > A)I would like SOSA and SSN as the simplest. > Same here (see my long email with all the arguments). > B)Otherwise I like SOSA-Core and SOSA. > Same here but I would also be fine with 'SOSA-lite and SOSA' or 'SOSA and SOSA-full'. Nonetheless, I would very strongly prefer SOSA and SSN. Thanks, Krzysztof > Chris > > Apologies – at best, I will only be on IRC at the SDW telco. > > *From:*Kerry Taylor [mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 04, 2017 12:37 AM > *To:* public-sdw-wg@w3.org > *Cc:* Armin Haller; Ed Parsons > *Subject:* Voting on a name for ssn this week in plenary > > Dear SDW, > > As you recall, we have decided that the ssn/sosa ontologies will have > two separate namespaces, but not what those namespaces are. This will > be determined in the PLENARY meeting this week. If you cannot attend > the plenary, please make your opinion known by reply to this email > before the meeting. > > This issue can be separated into three: > > 1. STEM name > > Choose between > > (a) Sensor, Observation, Sample, and Actuator > ontology– sosa > > (b) Semantic Sensor Network ontology – ssn > > 2. SUFFIX name > > Choose between > > (a) “lite” > > (b) “simple” > > (c) “full” > > 3. CONNECTOR symbol > > Choose between > > (a) “-“ hyphen > > (b) “_” underscore > > (c) “” nothing – juxtaposition only > > For example, choosing every (a) option for 1, 2 and 3 would derive > “sosa-lite” and “sosa” as the suffixes for the namespace uris and also > the recommended namespace prefixes for the simpler and fuller > ontologies respectively. Choosing 1b,2c,3c would derive “ssn“ and > “ssnfull” for the simpler and fuller ontologies respectively. > > Please indicate your preference for each of the three questions > independently --- as the result will combine the preferred option from > each of the three questions. > > -Kerry > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2017 19:14:41 UTC