Re: Agenda+ for this week's plenary: state of play in SSN

Phil,

Yes, I agree. We add to the beginning of the meeting.

Ed


On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 at 15:40 Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> wrote:

> Can I just point out that the disagreement is only on a naming issue
> (whereby as far as I can tell, everyone can live with the names as they are
> implemented now). Otherwise there has no disagreement been recorded over
> the last couple of weeks and we are working through the remaining issues
> swiftly!
>
> On 5/4/17, 10:33 pm, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>
>     Ed,
>
>     Given the large amount and content of e-mail seen since last night's
> SSN
>     meeting, with your permission, I'd like to add an item to the agenda
> for
>     today's plenary around the state of play with that deliverable. It
> seems
>     clear to me that there is still significant disagreement within the WG
>     about a number of fundamental issues and that therefore we must come to
>     a decision about its future. This within the broader context of the
> WG's
>     other deliverables and imminent charter expiry.
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Phil
>
>     --
>
>
>     Phil Archer
>     Data Strategist, W3C
>     http://www.w3.org/
>
>     http://philarcher.org
>     +44 (0)7887 767755 <07887%20767755>
>     @philarcher1
>
>
>
> --


*Ed Parsons *FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

+44 7825 382263 @edparsons
www.edparsons.com