- From: Bruce Bannerman <bruce.bannerman@bom.gov.au>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 00:31:46 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
One aspect that may be missed in the WaterML 2 / WDTF and the ACORN-SAT comparison: - WaterML is a community agreed semantic representation of that domain's data. Using it organisations can exchange data and be 'fairly' comfortable that they are sharing the same concepts. - ACORN-SAT is a representation of an internal file format used by one team, within one organisation. We need to find a way to adequately support the community agreed representations of a domain's data for true interoperability. I expect that the community agreed representations will mature as they get real world usage. So if they are 'ugly' now, it doesn't mean that this will always be so. Bruce ________________________________________ From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 6:34 PM To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Kerry Taylor Subject: Re: WaterML2 as RDF? Bill, this was something Kerry talked about way back at the workshop. See her paper at [1] and my over-simplified reportage at [2]. [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/03/lgd/agenda#wwstandards [2] https://www.w3.org/2014/03/lgd/report#themes On 03/04/2017 13:41, Jon Blower wrote: > Hi Bill, > > In the MELODIES project, one of our partners looked at doing something similar. > In the end I think they decided to keep the actual data values out of the RDF > for efficiency reasons. (I think they ended up with some kind of mixture of RDF > and WaterML, and I’m not sure whether they were using WaterML 1 or 2.) > > I could put you in touch if you want to talk with them further. > > Cheers, > Jon > > *From: *Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> > *Date: *Monday, 3 April 2017 13:10 > *To: *"public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > *Subject: *WaterML2 as RDF? > *Resent-From: *<public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Monday, 3 April 2017 13:10 > > Hi all > > I have an application coming up where I'd like to represent some time series of > observations, currently expressed in WaterML2, as RDF - probably in the RDF Data > Cube vocabulary. > > Does anyone in the group know of examples of this having been done before that I > could learn from/ copy / re-use? > > Thanks > > Bill > -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2017 00:33:22 UTC