- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:34:48 +0100
- To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Bill, this was something Kerry talked about way back at the workshop. See her paper at [1] and my over-simplified reportage at [2]. [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/03/lgd/agenda#wwstandards [2] https://www.w3.org/2014/03/lgd/report#themes On 03/04/2017 13:41, Jon Blower wrote: > Hi Bill, > > In the MELODIES project, one of our partners looked at doing something similar. > In the end I think they decided to keep the actual data values out of the RDF > for efficiency reasons. (I think they ended up with some kind of mixture of RDF > and WaterML, and I’m not sure whether they were using WaterML 1 or 2.) > > I could put you in touch if you want to talk with them further. > > Cheers, > Jon > > *From: *Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> > *Date: *Monday, 3 April 2017 13:10 > *To: *"public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > *Subject: *WaterML2 as RDF? > *Resent-From: *<public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Monday, 3 April 2017 13:10 > > Hi all > > I have an application coming up where I'd like to represent some time series of > observations, currently expressed in WaterML2, as RDF - probably in the RDF Data > Cube vocabulary. > > Does anyone in the group know of examples of this having been done before that I > could learn from/ copy / re-use? > > Thanks > > Bill > -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2017 08:34:56 UTC