W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 05:27:10 +0000
To: <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
CC: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1464499630045.78302@csiro.au>
Thanks for this reminder Frans.

I've added the list of requirements for Time into the pre-amble, and started adding notes into the text where the issues have been addressed.



See the section 'Changes from previous versions'<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#changes>



Simon
Simon J D Cox
Research Scientist
Land and Water<http://www.csiro.au/Organisation-Structure/Flagships/Land-and-Water>
CSIRO
E simon.cox@csiro.au T +61 3 9545 2365 M +61 403 302 672
   Physical: Reception Central, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Vic 3168
   Deliveries: Gate 3, Normanby Road, Clayton, Vic 3168
   Postal: Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Vic 3169
people.csiro.au/C/S/Simon-Cox<http://people.csiro.au/C/S/Simon-Cox>
orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-3420<http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-3420>
researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Cox3<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Cox3>
________________________________
From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Sent: Friday, 27 May 2016 7:27 PM
To: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)
Cc: SDW WG Public List
Subject: Re: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

Hello Simon,

Do you think it is possible to add a bit about how the new ontology addresses the requirements from the UCR document<https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-ucr/#arTimeOntologyInOWL> before the FPWD? That would show how the document is grounded in previous work, and give the reader some extra insight in the new capabilities of the ontology. Or do you think all UCR requirements are already addressed by the added ontology elements and the issues marked red?

Anyway, I think the document will be a very good FPWD as it is. I love the added examples! I hope many people working with temporal data will be aware of the document and their opportunity to comment.

Regards,
Frans



2016-05-26 0:30 GMT+02:00 <Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>>:
>    jtandy: I believe Simon is taking his previous work and putting it into shape. Chris is providing wider context

Yes. This is now essentially complete, in the draft http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ .
There are a number of ISSUEs highlighted in the text, most linked to issues in the tracker https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/open

I've also put the draft revised ontology in the github repo, and linked it in the document following the same style as in the SSN document, as well as two documents containing the examples I added - see https://github.com/w3c/sdw/tree/gh-pages/time/rdf .

Chris has much deeper knowledge about temporal reference systems, so I put a hook in there for him to respond to -  http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#time:TRS but no bite yet.

The document may be suitable to be issued as FPWD, but, as Ed notes, so far I've been the sole contributor.
I have consensus with myself, but that's probably not good enough ...

Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>]
Sent: Thursday, 26 May 2016 12:31 AM
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
Subject: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

The minutes of today's meeting are at
https://www.w3.org/2016/05/25-sdw-minutes with a text snapshot below.

[...]

Time Progress

    <eparsons> [13]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/

      [13] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/

    eparsons: this is stuff that Simon has been getting on and
    doing

    <frans> Does the SDW BP reference DW best practices by URI?

    eparsons: Pretty much on his own.
    ... He has difficulty joining these calls due to time zone
    issues.
    ... I guess this is a call for us to look at it and then
    socialise it/.
    ... But note that there is a lot of good work going on.

    jtandy: Chris is still involved and working with Simon. I've
    been in Geneva so a bit out of the loop.

    eparsons: I just want to make sure it's not just Simon working
    in isolation.

    jtandy: I believe Simon is taking his previous work and putting
    it into shape. Chris is providing wider context


[...]

    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2016 05:27:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:21 UTC