RE: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

Simon, Jeremy, and SDW colleagues,

Having got some documents finished and posted in time for the OGC Tech Conf in Dublin in three weeks, and a couple of other meetings (WMO and medical/Disaster Risk Reduction), the topic of Time has now surfaced at the top of the heap of stuff to do.

Currently at home but will catch up and appear online next week.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au] 
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 4:21 AM
To: Tandy, Jeremy; Little, Chris
Subject: RE: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

> you could also nudge him during the OAB on Tue!

I've stepped aside from the OAB, and they have moved the meeting time to my wee-small-hours, so I am not even inclined to play my 'emeritus' card ... So haven't heard Little Chris in weeks. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tandy, Jeremy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, 26 May 2016 6:36 PM
To: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>; Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
Subject: RE: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

Hi Chris- it looks like it’s a great time to re-engage with Simon on the time-related SDW deliverables.

> Chris has much deeper knowledge about temporal reference systems, so I put a hook in there for him to respond to -  http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#time:TRS but no bite yet.

Can you add these sections to what will become the FPWD deliverable?

Also, a thorough review would be appreciated; Simon says:

> so far I've been the sole contributor. I have consensus with myself, but that's probably not good enough ...

(Simon, for reference, Chris is out of office today and as a part time worker doesn't work Fri or Mon - hopefully Chris will be able to respond to you next week ... you could also nudge him during the OAB on Tue!)

Jeremy

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au] 
Sent: 25 May 2016 23:33
To: Tandy, Jeremy
Cc: Little, Chris; Trevelyan, Pete
Subject: FW: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

Chris has not responded to any of my mails over the last month or so. I saw one posting to the list from him, yesterday I think, so I know he's paying attention to some. But am concerned he's missing mine (Spam filter?) 

Simon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) 
Sent: Thursday, 26 May 2016 8:31 AM
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

>    jtandy: I believe Simon is taking his previous work and putting it into shape. Chris is providing wider context

Yes. This is now essentially complete, in the draft http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ . 
There are a number of ISSUEs highlighted in the text, most linked to issues in the tracker https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/open 

I've also put the draft revised ontology in the github repo, and linked it in the document following the same style as in the SSN document, as well as two documents containing the examples I added - see https://github.com/w3c/sdw/tree/gh-pages/time/rdf . 

Chris has much deeper knowledge about temporal reference systems, so I put a hook in there for him to respond to -  http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#time:TRS but no bite yet. 

The document may be suitable to be issued as FPWD, but, as Ed notes, so far I've been the sole contributor. 
I have consensus with myself, but that's probably not good enough ... 

Simon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, 26 May 2016 12:31 AM
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

The minutes of today's meeting are at
https://www.w3.org/2016/05/25-sdw-minutes with a text snapshot below.

[...]

Time Progress

    <eparsons> [13]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/


      [13] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/


    eparsons: this is stuff that Simon has been getting on and
    doing

    <frans> Does the SDW BP reference DW best practices by URI?

    eparsons: Pretty much on his own.
    ... He has difficulty joining these calls due to time zone
    issues.
    ... I guess this is a call for us to look at it and then
    socialise it/.
    ... But note that there is a lot of good work going on.

    jtandy: Chris is still involved and working with Simon. I've
    been in Geneva so a bit out of the loop.

    eparsons: I just want to make sure it's not just Simon working
    in isolation.

    jtandy: I believe Simon is taking his previous work and putting
    it into shape. Chris is providing wider context


[...]

    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________

Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 15:03:06 UTC