RE: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s)

On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:09 AM Raphaël Troncy wrote:

> >  Thanks Kerry - that's essentially the way I see it, if by "linked
> > data representation" you are implying RDF. I would like to ask those
> > people advocating a new CRS encoding in RDF, what this would be
> > useful for?
> 
> Well of course, this is a very "niche" usage, but typical use cases are
> for getting an explicit semantic description of how a CRS has been built
> so that you can, for example, query for all CRSs that use a specific
> Datum, or, more simply, ask for the EPSG identifier corresponding to the
> URI of a CRS, etc.

Another case would be to get information about lat/long vs. long/lat.

Best,

Lars

Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2015 11:51:26 UTC