Re: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s)

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Svensson, Lars <> wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:09 AM Raphaël Troncy wrote:
>> >  Thanks Kerry - that's essentially the way I see it, if by "linked
>> > data representation" you are implying RDF. I would like to ask those
>> > people advocating a new CRS encoding in RDF, what this would be
>> > useful for?
>> Well of course, this is a very "niche" usage, but typical use cases are
>> for getting an explicit semantic description of how a CRS has been built
>> so that you can, for example, query for all CRSs that use a specific
>> Datum, or, more simply, ask for the EPSG identifier corresponding to the
>> URI of a CRS, etc.
> Another case would be to get information about lat/long vs. long/lat.



Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 15:24:47 UTC