- From: Micah McG <mcglabs@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:12:29 -0400
- To: Alex <schemaorg@centromere.net>
- Cc: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACjiiSTjJXsphie41cBLzZV5uRdezLE8jCfg7OVMiGPORsDJuw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Alex, Have you run this question through an LLM? I just ran it through chatGPT and provided a response that seemed relatively applicable, as most LLMs are pretty well versed in microformats and semantic markup. Maybe you could feedback what you glean from your conversation here, and may help us better give you feedback if it doesn't fully answer your question. On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:11 AM Alex <schemaorg@centromere.net> wrote: > Hello, > > I am embarking on a project to classify and organize video content > hosted on a particular website which I do not control. I have > significant experience with software engineering, however I am new to > RDF, OWL, and formal data modeling techniques in general. I understand > the problem Schema.org is trying to solve, and I am thankful that it > exists. I also recognize that Schema.org's OWL representation is > experimental. > > I began by installing Protégé and importing the OWL ontology[0]. Then, > I arbitrarily selected a piece of video content and created a > Named Individual to represent it. It seemed good to me to begin by > instantiating a property which points to the URL of the content I am > trying to classify. Unfortunately, the `url` property[1] appears in > Protégé as an object property, not a data property. I take this to mean > that, in order to have a Thing point to a URL, I have to create a Named > or Anonymous Individual. This is not intuitive to me, as it seems more > natural to specify the URL as a literal value. The same is true of the > `duration` property[2]. > > Therefore, I have the following questions: > > 1. Is Protégé a good tool for this project? > 2. Is my desire to use `url` and `duration` as literal data properties > and /not/ object properties in the spirit of how Schema.org is intended > to be used? > 3. If so, how can I work around this issue? > > Thank you, > Alex > > > [0] https://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl > [1] https://schema.org/url > [2] https://schema.org/duration > > >
Received on Monday, 22 July 2024 23:12:46 UTC