- From: Jacob Jett <jjett2@illinois.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:02:20 -0600
- To: Webmestre Globetrottoirs <webmaster@globetrottoirs.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 23:03:31 UTC
Actually I was thinking something along these lines as well. A generic TheatricalProduction which then has play, musical, vaudville, etc. genre classification. _____________________________________________________ Jacob Jett Research Assistant Center for Informatics Research in Science and Scholarship The Graduate School of Library and Information Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 501 E. Daniel Street, MC-493, Champaign, IL 61820-6211 USA (217) 244-2164 jjett2@illinois.edu On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Webmestre Globetrottoirs < webmaster@globetrottoirs.com> wrote: > Additional elements to my previous message. > > > > Could we imagine a creativework subtype named “stagework” which would > have a “genre” topic where it would be possible to indicate if it’s > theater, or music or dance, … > > > > Some generic stage jobs as director, actor, choregrapher, dancer, or > performer or designer would be used, and for other jobs using the same > architecture as cinema types in schema.org. > > > > This is to evitate to have too specific terms as said Richard, which are > not much relevant in that type of classification. > > > > I hesitate to use creativeworkseries (what I did, in fact in some pages), > because it is not really relevant talking about a stage creation which is > not an element of a series. > > > > Stéphane > > www.globetrottoirs.com > > >
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 23:03:31 UTC