+1 for StageWork (assuming we can all accept the Bard's "All the World's a Stage" premise and not get too pedantic about what constitutes a stage). This solution seems to encompass a wide variety of performance types not currently specified. Also it makes sense to me for that to inherit the genre property from CreativeWork, as Stéphane suggests. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Richard Wallis < richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote: > … liking StageWork. > > Richard Wallis > Founder, Data Liberate > http://dataliberate.com > Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis > Twitter: @rjw > > On 3 March 2016 at 22:38, Webmestre Globetrottoirs < > webmaster@globetrottoirs.com> wrote: > >> Additional elements to my previous message. >> >> >> >> Could we imagine a creativework subtype named “stagework” which would >> have a “genre” topic where it would be possible to indicate if it’s >> theater, or music or dance, … >> >> >> >> Some generic stage jobs as director, actor, choregrapher, dancer, or >> performer or designer would be used, and for other jobs using the same >> architecture as cinema types in schema.org. >> >> >> >> This is to evitate to have too specific terms as said Richard, which are >> not much relevant in that type of classification. >> >> >> >> I hesitate to use creativeworkseries (what I did, in fact in some pages), >> because it is not really relevant talking about a stage creation which is >> not an element of a series. >> >> >> >> Stéphane >> >> www.globetrottoirs.com >> >> >> > > -- *Eric Axel Franzon* LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon Twitter: http://twitter.com/EricAxel G+: http://http://gplus.to/ericfranzon Online Business Card: http://ericaxel.magntize.com
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 22:57:38 UTC