- From: Sean Petiya <spetiya1@kent.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:13:04 -0400
- To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEwMCJ4+hEeLbvP1WZGPA0sy3NA0MOTbqfe6Y718yq_VOD1xEQ@mail.gmail.com>
I've been working on a comic book ontology, and would like to share how I've handled roles. (A) Each comics specific role, or at least major role (e.g. penciller, letterer, inker) has its own property [1] (B) Usage of a general 'role' property for other credit descriptions [2] For what its worth, all URIs in this namespace are dereferenceable. Jeff, hopefully this project appears more mature and developed than when I first shared it with you. :) Regarding the Periodicals/Comics proposal, I think penciler/inker/letterer is a good, comics-specific set that covers the major comic book credits (plus schema:author, schema:editor, etc.). Artist is also helpful for covering credits like painter, illustrator, and even designer. While I have not specified a cover artist property in the current version of the ontology, coverArtist would be a very useful and important property, especially for retailers as this is often a major selling point. Is the proposal on the SchemaBibEx wiki open for discussion or input? I would be interesting in participating. Sean Petiya [1] https://comicmeta.org/cbo/contributor.html (see subproperties) [2] https://comicmeta.org/cbo/Role.html (see individuals) On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: > Forwarding the message below to SchemaBibEx for comment: > > > > I think we talked at some point about “MARC Code List for Relators” as a > potential set of “extension” properties to Schema.org. > > > > http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators.html > > > > The comic proposal includes some that could be accounted for there and > some that can’t: > > > > artist => http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/art > > colorist => http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/clr > > coverArtist > > inker > > letterer > > penciler > > > > I noticed recently, though, that WikiData is starting to account for a > surprising number of these relationships with multilingual labels available: > > > > artist http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q483501 > > colorist http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q873236 > > coverArtist > > inker http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1153051 > > letterer http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q658404 > > penciler > > > > Some are also represented as outright properties in their vocabulary: > > > > http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties/Works > > > > Jeff > > > > *From:* davide-romanini [mailto:notifications@github.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:37 PM > *To:* schemaorg/schemaorg > *Subject:* [schemaorg] Vocabulary for comics (#378) > > > > Here: > > http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Periodicals_and_Comics_synthesis > > there is some work done to add comics support to schema.org. I'm using > that on a personal project (http://github.com/davide-romanini/scrooge > <https://github.com/davide-romanini/scrooge>). > What about integration of that work on main stream? Probably the most > useful feature are the additional specialized types. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/378>.[image: > https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AKKnbdtylEV2bNUvATbNDco8txON1Sf6ks5n0ILngaJpZM4DtKhc.gif] >
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 09:37:51 UTC