- From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:48:10 -0500
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > Hi and Happy New Year! > > A simple one to start the conversation in 2014. > > Can I have +/- 1’s for submitting the Article proposal > <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article> to the public-vocabs > list. > > The only change I would make is to it’s name which I think should be > “Periodicals, Articles & Multi-volume Works” -1 until we at least acknowledge how the Bibliographic Ontology has informed our proposal (giving credit where credit is due). I think we should also include a rationale for why we surfaced the PublicationVolume type (for which there is no equivalent in bibo) as that's going to complicate mappings between our proposed schema.org extension and bibo. In the last call for +1/-1 I had also suggested including examples that follow the schema.org standard (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/2013Dec/0143.html) for each new type. I had offered to add such examples earlier in the thread (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/2013Dec/0117.html), and that offer still stands, but without a yea/nay I don't want to mess with the proposal.
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:48:38 UTC