- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:14:55 +0000
- To: "kcoyle@kcoyle.net" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
I don't see how it can be a matter of interpretation. Here's the data that the DOI Linked Data delivers: http://bit.ly/1dsJhOF This makes it clear that the DOI URI identifies the article, not the content-negotiated description of the article (which is located at this URI): http://data.crossref.org/10.1080%2F01639374.2012.682254 Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:57 AM > To: public-schemabibex@w3.org > Subject: Re: Proposing Article > > I agree that it is a matter of interpretation, and that is because the > DOI itself can be ambiguous. > > kc > > On 1/14/14, 6:48 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote: > > Good point. > > > > I suppose the schema:url property would be expected to be a link to > > the 'thing', whereas a doi url links you to a description of the > > article which is the sameAs the description we are building in our > examples. > > > > I presume in some cases that the URI would be the same (for the > > article text and the description) in others it would be different. > > Personally I would lean towards using schema:sameAs in at least some > of our examples. > > > > ~Richard > > > > On 14 Jan 2014, at 14:13, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org > > <mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>> wrote: > > > >> It seems to me that the DOI should be schema:sameAs rather than > >> schema:url. > >> I notice that the schema:author/publisher/about are treated as text > >> strings sometimes and blank node typed entities in others. Perhaps > >> this was intentional? > >> Other than that, it looks good. > >> Jeff > >> *From:*Wallis,Richard [mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org] > >> *Sent:*Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:51 AM > >> *To:*public-schemabibex@w3.org <mailto:public-schemabibex@w3.org> > >> *Subject:*Proposing Article > >> Hi and Happy New Year! > >> A simple one to start the conversation in 2014. > >> Can I have +/- 1's for submitting the Article proposal > >> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article> to the > >> public-vocabs list. > >> The only change I would make is to it's name which I think should be > >> "Periodicals, Articles & Multi-volume Works" > >> ~Richard > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:15:26 UTC