- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:10:10 -0800
- To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
On 12/6/13 1:11 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote: > > OK, starting the research: > - there's startDate and endDate on (separately!) > http://schema.org/Season and http://schema.org/Series, > http://schema.org/Event > - there's startTime and endTime on http://schema.org/Action > > Perhaps some homogeneization could help (though I suspect it's hard to > change names on established classes). Aiiiyyy! I see no semantic difference between the start and end dates on series. It even looks like series has a similar definitional problem to Offer: the name is Series but it is defined as "A TV or radio series." There are many other things that come in a series, obviously. In any case, would startDAte/endDate be suitable as sub to Intangible? In fact, all of the variants of Date/time might go good there since they are of universal utility. I've been thinking that one may need an enumeration for publication pattern, which would therefore be located in Intangible, and would have, for example: yearly, bi-yearly, monthly, bi-monthly, weekly, bi-weekly (and, yes, bi-, is very ambiguous), daily. kc > > >> I've adjusted the proposal >> accordingly (and made the issues in the PeriodicalVolume example >> actually link to the volume in question... heh). > > OK! > > Antoine > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 15:10:38 UTC