- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:27:30 +0000
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net
- Cc: public-schemabibex@w3.org
- Message-Id: <6A62820C-7A1C-469E-8BFB-DDE894DCAB19@deri.org>
Do we have a task list? Perhaps that would help move us forward -- since we seem in agreement that search engines are the primary target of schema.org. I see several tasks suggested by Karen's email: On 5 Nov 2012, at 23:52, Karen Coyle wrote: > When I look at our use cases, most of them do not make reference to > search engine functionality. Perhaps that's a place where we could > start... by clarifying for each use case what search/display function it > serves. TASK: Edit use cases to mention what search engine functionality this will support. http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Use_Cases Example: show local print holdings > [1] http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2012/09/rich-snippets.html > the medical community has > created documentation to explain their approach to schema.org [2] > [2] http://schema.org/docs/meddocs.html > mark-up and how they think it will help users. We probably need a > similar statement to explain WHY library-related metadata is relevant to > schema.org goals. TASK: Write a short statement about WHY this extension is necessary. http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Why_Extend I've added these to the front page of the wiki. Feel free to do them -- or add other tasks we could/should do now.... -Jodi
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 11:28:00 UTC