- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:37:36 +0000
- To: Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>
- Cc: public-schemabibex@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 11:38:05 UTC
+1 on the "appropriate copy" aspect. I've added this to the "why extend" page: http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Why_Extend Besides these, what features determine access to services? > geo, IP range, personal subscription Such representations of the access features of an item could be useful for schema.org. -Jodi On 6 Nov 2012, at 09:48, Owen Stephens wrote: > > For example - knowing that I can access a film via my existing NetFlix subscription is just as valid an outcome as knowing that I can buy it from Amazon or borrow it from my local library. See also the Kindle Lending Library, Spotify, Pandora, etc. etc. > > This suggests to me two things we would need to be able to describe: > > What a service has to offer (in the library world 'holdings') > The characteristics of those that can typically make use of the service (whether based on geo, IP range, personal subscription, etc.) > > I like that these feel less niche than 'expressing library holdings'.
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 11:38:05 UTC