- From: Stuart Sutton <sasutton@dublincore.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:14:02 -0700
- To: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-schema-course-extend@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK74qRsBVB1kzi5njv_BHekjL1MJZiYsJ7JH2d51UVOHHF40Hg@mail.gmail.com>
+1 on the range change. On the matter of credential/credential subclasses, the CTI is *very close* to finalizing it's set of credential subclasses. That could well provide more specific ranges; BUT, that said, schema.org should nevertheless push ahead in the next build with range as proposed. Stuart On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote: > (Doing things slightly out of order here) > > While noting Wes's comments about the range / expected type for > educationalCredentialAwarded and modelling of Credential, on the basis of > all the other comments in the last day or so and from last time we went > over this issue, I intend to progress as proposed below (with one minor > change), as that represents the furthest on which there is a degree > consensus. > > The minor change is to use Url rather than Thing as an alternative to > plain text, as Dan suggested. > > Hence including http://pending.webschemas.org/educationalCredentialAwarded > in the proposal of what can be proposed for inclusion in the next draft of > schema.org > > Here's hoping the wider credentialling community can get us further. > > Regards, Phil > > On 18/08/2016 14:18, Phil Barker wrote: > >> Hello all, one last call for feedback on this (sorry I left it hanging >> earlier in the summer, if you really have the time you can review the >> discussion at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/ >> Public/public-schema-course-extend/2016Jun/0019.html ) >> >> In short I propose: >> >> 1. that we provide a property of course which can be used to point to an >> educational credential that may be available to those who complete a course. >> >> 2. that the expected type for this property be Text or Thing until such >> time as a specific model for educational credentials be created >> >> 3. that we do not attempt to model educational credentials as part of >> this work. >> >> It is on point 3 that I would most welcome feedback. >> >> See http://course.schema-course-extend.appspot.com/educationalCr >> edentialAwarded for details >> >> Brief Rational: the ability to provide a name and a URI for and >> educational credential which may be obtained by successful completion of >> the course is enough fulfil the use case requirement of being able to find >> courses that offer some specific requirement; modelling educational >> credentials would divert us from completing what is necessary to fulfil the >> other use cases; and, educational credentials touch on many communities >> that are not well represented in this group. >> >> Comments / feedback / dissent? >> >> Phil >> >> >> On 22/06/2016 11:20, Phil Barker wrote: >> >>> >>> I have drafted a description and a couple of examples based on the >>> proposal below. >>> >>> See wiki >>> https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Ident >>> ifying_the_qualification_offered >>> >>> and test course.schema site >>> http://course.schema-course-extend.appspot.com/Course >>> http://course.schema-course-extend.appspot.com/educationalCr >>> edentialAwarded >>> >>> Any further comments/amendments? >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> On 20/06/16 14:05, Phil Barker wrote: >>> >>>> OK. As property name I am going to suggest educationalCredentialAwarded >>>> because we might in the future want EducationalCredential as a class name. >>>> >>>> So, my proposal is that in order to meet the use case that people can >>>> search for courses that offers a qualification the searcher would like to >>>> acquire we create a new property >>>> >>>> educationalCredentialAwarded domain Course, range Text or Thing. >>>> Definition: a description of the qualification, award, certificate, >>>> diploma or other educational credential awarded as a consequence of >>>> successful completion of this course. >>>> >>>> When the educational credentials/verifiable claims community have >>>> sorted out how they want to describe their domain in schema.org then I >>>> hope we will have some more specific schema type(s) that we can point to, >>>> but for now this seems to me to be good enough to solve the use case. >>>> Solving the bigger issue seems beyond the scope of this community group. >>>> >>>> Phil >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- > Phil Barker @philbarker > LRMI, Cetis, ICBL http://people.pjjk.net/phil > Heriot-Watt University > > Workflow: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/workflow/ > > >
Received on Friday, 19 August 2016 10:14:33 UTC