- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:15:45 -0500
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: public-webid Group <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
For what it's worth, I had flushed some ideas at [1]. Alexandre. [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/Requirements On 12/11/2012 10:11 AM, Henry Story wrote: > To make some progress, I think we need a use cases and requirements document. > > At TPAC the main interest was to be able to work with the newly emerging > Linked Data Platform group [1]. I don't think that LDP says anything about > 303s so I don't think this is in fact necessarily relevant to the 303 vs hash > debate. > > But it does give us a good reason to have HTTP URIs because we can then use > that platform to do things like the following: > > > Create an account > ----------------- > > ( requires LDP + WebAccessControl ) > > 1. Find an a LD Collection that is publicly available and allows creation of containers > 2. create a container that gives default access to the creator ( perhaps using hash id ) > 3. creator can POST a WebID Profile to container with public key > > Restful Mail > ------------ > > 1. Use the WebID profile to find a Collection for sending mail like content > 2. POST a mail like entity there after authenticating with WebID > ( now that gives us secure mail ) > > Pingback > -------- > > similar to Restful Mail, but simpler > > > Friend of a friend Access > ------------------------- > > Allow friends of friends access to some resources > > > > So we have a page for this here which we started a few years back > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements > > I think it is time to work on that one again. > > Henry > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldp.html > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ >
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 15:15:55 UTC