Re: Checklist proposal for XAUR document

Hi John,

Thanks for that. Yes, I agree - and this thinking is a part of my 
overall approach. Indeed the MAUR is a helpful template.

I also note that MAUR is for a relatively simpler part of the stack, as 
it relates to rather specific aspects of the HTML spec (<audio>, <video> 
elements).

The scope for XR and indeed the other domains you mention is much broader.

Having said that the template, for now is the MAUR.

As a parting thought - we also need to work out how XAUR etc relates to 
other specifications like WCAG, Silver - as well as the very useful FAST.

Thanks

Josh

On 29/08/2019 19:18, John Foliot wrote:
> Hi Josh (and everyone)
>
> I appreciate Jason's suggestion regarding a checklist, however personally
> I'd rather see this new document more closely follow the "template"
> initially established by the MAUR, which you've already started on Josh,
> while at the same time noting that we've published the MAUR as a *W3C Note*,
> which I would anticipate we would also do with the XUAR.
>
> I envision that going forward, we'll likely see more documentation like
> this (the MAUR, the XUAR, perhaps one for IoT/Home Automation, etc.) and
> having all of the documents using a pre-established pattern/structure would
> have a knock-on benefit in that we'll have a 'collection' of similar
> documents(*).  I know we've touched on this idea in the past at APA (and
> formally at PF).
>
> Providing a second or supplementary "checklist" as Jason suggests could
> (should?) be an activity that EO WG could then take up, based upon the
> original XUAR document.
>
> My $0.02 Cdn.
>
-- 
Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)

Received on Friday, 30 August 2019 07:02:04 UTC