- From: Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:52:24 +0100
- To: Scott Hollier <scott@hollier.info>, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
- Cc: "group-apa-chairs@w3.org" <group-apa-chairs@w3.org>
Great, thanks for the considered feedback Scott. Lets explore that - and I'm going to start work on some suggested checklist items for each of the categories and we can review to see if the group feels I'm taking it in the right direction on Weds. Thanks all Josh On 30/08/2019 03:12, Scott Hollier wrote: > To Josh > > I really like the checklist idea. I agree with Jason's' original point that guidance is needed, but not at the expense of the simplicity the current document provides. As discussed on the call, the current document works well in terms of introducing people to the XR space and I wouldn't want to see this lost. > > As such, the checklist idea is a really good one: it retains the XAUR informative process of guiding people through access considerations, then in the checklist provides XR specific guidance to developers/designers that need it Best of all, it does this without taking away the normative value of standards that will cover this space in the future. In fact it may even provide such standards an opportunity to draw on the checklist for guidance. > > +1 from me - best of both worlds IMHO. . > > Scott. -- Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
Received on Friday, 30 August 2019 06:52:29 UTC