W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2008

response on xpath "op" namespace

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:58:04 -0400
To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4718.1210967884@ubuhebe>



http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2008May/0061.html

We should probably brainstorm some more about how many namespaces to use
for RIF builtins, and if more-than-one, what really motivates the
division.

     -- Sandro

Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 20:00:29 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gary Hallmark: "Re: Any proposals for a Concise RIF XML Syntax?"
Previous message: Gary Hallmark: "Re: RIF UCR --> RIF UC"
Next in thread: Jos de Bruijn: "Re: response on xpath "op" namespace"
Reply: Jos de Bruijn: "Re: response on xpath "op" namespace"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:44 UTC