- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 16:05:38 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 14:06:23 UTC
At the moment I do not really see a reasonable criterion for making a
division, so I'm leaning towards just having one namespace.
Best, Jos
Sandro Hawke wrote:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2008May/0061.html
>
> We should probably brainstorm some more about how many namespaces to use
> for RIF builtins, and if more-than-one, what really motivates the
> division.
>
> -- Sandro
>
>
--
debruijn@inf.unibz.it
Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
One man that has a mind and knows it can
always beat ten men who haven't and don't.
-- George Bernard Shaw
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 14:06:23 UTC