- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 16:05:38 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 14:06:23 UTC
At the moment I do not really see a reasonable criterion for making a division, so I'm leaning towards just having one namespace. Best, Jos Sandro Hawke wrote: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2008May/0061.html > > We should probably brainstorm some more about how many namespaces to use > for RIF builtins, and if more-than-one, what really motivates the > division. > > -- Sandro > > -- debruijn@inf.unibz.it Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- One man that has a mind and knows it can always beat ten men who haven't and don't. -- George Bernard Shaw
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 14:06:23 UTC