- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:58:09 -0400
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Occasionally people talk about making the XML syntax for RIF more terse and easy to read by humans. I remember Jos and Hassan saying things in this direction fairly recently. A long time ago we went through a suggestion I had for this -- I proposed some rules for when you could skip a stripe as redundant -- but we decided against that (with me concurring). I wonder if there are any other proposals for a concise RIF XML syntax? If so, they'd need to come forward very very soon. (Some would say it's too late already, but... *shrug*) I started a table where one could do an ad hoc version of this: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/BLD_Syntax_Table Please edit at will, with comments here, if this is something you're interested in. -- Sandro [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/01/30-rif-minutes.html http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Arch/XML_Syntax_Issues_1
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 16:00:35 UTC