- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:34:03 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Sandro Hawke wrote: > The recommendation from the Semantic Web Coordination Group on this > matter of a new datatype [1][2] is to proceed with the single, small > Recommendation. It's not clear what namespace to use, yet, but > hopefully it will become clearer soon. (I'm leaning towards using the > XML Schema namespace, if that WG will consent.) > > So -- any volunteers, from either RIF or OWL to be an editor of this > document? Ideally, I'd like one from each WG, since it's not clear yet > which WG will formally carry it through the process. For an example of > a very short Rec, see [3]. > > -- Sandro > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008May/0060 > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008May/0021.html > [3] http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/ > Can we have some discussion first please? A not dissimilar design was considered and rejected in a long and difficult discussion by RDF Core and we should review their (many) notes. J
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 16:35:05 UTC