- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 13:42:23 -0400
- To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> Sandro Hawke wrote: > > > > Maybe we can focus on issues in the XML syntax instead? > > Agreed. > > Since it seems that (at least some of) the problems with the PS are > related to the PS2XML mapping; since the PS is a convenience and, as > such, precisely specified only wehere needed; and since, until resolved > otherwise, only the XML will be normative, shouldn't we specify the XML > syntax precisely and derive the PS from the XML, rather than the reverse? > > (And: no, it is not too late to change the organisation of BLD and > switch to that mode; esp. if it saves us time wrt such issues as > metadata/group, Const/CURIEs etc). I like your jokes. Especially when you tell them in person. (really :-) But April 1 was > 1 month ago. cheers --michael > Cheers, > > Christian > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 17:48:45 UTC