> Sandro Hawke wrote: > > > > Maybe we can focus on issues in the XML syntax instead? > > Agreed. > > Since it seems that (at least some of) the problems with the PS are > related to the PS2XML mapping; since the PS is a convenience and, as > such, precisely specified only wehere needed; and since, until resolved > otherwise, only the XML will be normative, shouldn't we specify the XML > syntax precisely and derive the PS from the XML, rather than the reverse? > > (And: no, it is not too late to change the organisation of BLD and > switch to that mode; esp. if it saves us time wrt such issues as > metadata/group, Const/CURIEs etc). I like your jokes. Especially when you tell them in person. (really :-) But April 1 was > 1 month ago. cheers --michael > Cheers, > > Christian > >Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 17:48:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:44 UTC