- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 16:22:18 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro Hawke wrote: > > Maybe we can focus on issues in the XML syntax instead? Agreed. Since it seems that (at least some of) the problems with the PS are related to the PS2XML mapping; since the PS is a convenience and, as such, precisely specified only wehere needed; and since, until resolved otherwise, only the XML will be normative, shouldn't we specify the XML syntax precisely and derive the PS from the XML, rather than the reverse? (And: no, it is not too late to change the organisation of BLD and switch to that mode; esp. if it saves us time wrt such issues as metadata/group, Const/CURIEs etc). Cheers, Christian
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 14:27:48 UTC