- From: Jeff Z. Pan <jpan@csd.abdn.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:24:53 +0100
- To: "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
W3C - RIF Telecon 4 Jul 2006 Chair: csma Attendees on the phone: Sandro, Harold, Stan_Devitt (muted), DavidHirtle, PaulaP (muted), +1.705.756.aaaa, Axel_Polleres (muted), csma, Dave_Reynolds, JeffP, MarkusK (muted) Attendees on IRC: Donald_Chapin, johnhall, JeffP, DaveReynolds, AxelPolleres, MoZ, MarkusK, csma, PaulaP, StanDevitt, Harold, RRSAgent, DavidHirtle, Zakim, sandro, trackbot, Keep See also: IRC log Attendees Scribe JeffP Contents * Topics * Summary of Action Items csma: Next Meeting: 11 July 2006 PROPOSED: accept minutes of June 27 meeting <MoZ> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jun/0182.html <AxelPolleres> +1 <AxelPolleres> ... to accept the minutes csma: minutes accepted <sandro> RESOLVED: accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jun/0182.html as minutes of June 27 meeting csma: Agenda amendments? ... no <johnhall> Can't connect to phone - says 74394# is invalid <sandro> very very strange, johnhall. :-( Action review [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/4] csma: any comments? 3. Liaison Action review [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/3] <sandro> csma: Action about PRR draft still open because I haven't checked with Fair Isaac <AxelPolleres> Is SPARQL connected with some action item? csma: nothing new on Liaison <scribe> ACTION: csma and Chris Welty to solve the SPARQL liaison problem [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel <csma> ack ??p13 4. Use Cases and Requirements Review actions [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/6] <AxelPolleres> regrets on behalf of JosDeBruijn <AxelPolleres> I substitute for DERI csma: Is the action on JosDB done? <AxelPolleres> I think continued <DavidHirtle> latest draft (I believe): <DavidHirtle> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/ucr/draft-20060628 csma: any comments on UC&R? ... DavidH sent an email on this <PaulaP> +1 to remove the link to the CSF and keep the requirement <DaveReynolds> Suggest leaving in the CSF, update the diagram to match, leave the other CSF's for future iterations csma: anyone support remove the requirement altogether? ... no reply ... two options, one from Paula the other from DaveR <StanD> +1 for change diagram csma: we can ask Frank to change that ... anyone object? ... no reply <scribe> ACTION: csma to ack Frank to do the modification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel AxelP: shall we add a note in the XML requirement? <DavidHirtle> +1 to Dave DaveR: we need some mechanism to track things we want to do after the release <AxelPolleres> +1 to make open issues visible. sandro: it is more of a design issue DaveR: A wiki page can do the job ... three items on the todo list ... one on UC 2.5 <scribe> ACTION: on DavidH to add the three items to the consider/document issue list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action03] <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel <DaveReynolds> +1 the "to consider list" is small scale and leave in Wiki rather than confuse document <AxelPolleres> +1 if we add a reference to the to be considered list <DavidHirtle> I noticed that too, Paula PaulaP: the requirement is not clean ... under interoperability <DaveReynolds> Yes, should be linked in I think csma: we agreed to remove it from the diagram <scribe> ACTION: on Frank to remove the complain models, requirement from the interoperability diagram [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action04] <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel csma: other comments on the doc? AxelP: some minor issues that I can send to the mailing list <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to send a list with small edits by tomorrow night [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action05] <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel <scribe> ACTION: AxelP to email the list per some small edit for the doc by July 5 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action06] <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to send another mail with issues "to be considered" and add it to the wiki within 2 weeks [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action07] <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel <AxelPolleres> Can someone paste the URL of the issues list? <DavidHirtle> new issues list: <DavidHirtle> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Document_issues <DavidHirtle> old issues list: <DavidHirtle> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/WD-DC (section 2) <sandro> I assume we're not talking about: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/open csma: it is not easily accessible ... other comments? ... I will send an email to the list about the consider list ... for the details <PaulaP> yes, it is clear csma: resolution: the WG will publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just discussed <sandro> that is: csma: who is in favour of the resolution? <sandro> PROPOSED: publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just agreed to <sandro> Sandro/W3C YES <sandro> Harold/NCR YES <MoZ> MoZ/Innovimax YES <PaulaP> Paula/REWERSE - YES <sandro> PFPS/Bolzano YES AxelP: is there a timeline for the next version? csma: between 3-6 months <sandro> Axel/DERI_Innsbruck: YES <MarkusK> MarkusK/FZI YES <AxelPolleres> comment: we should not again postpone comments over more than one iteration <DaveReynolds> Dave Reynolds/HP YES <sandro> CSMA(with ILOG Hat)/ILOG: YES <sandro> Jeff Pan / Aberdeen: YES <Donald_Chapin> Donald/OMG YES csma: resolution adapted DavidH/NCR YES <sandro> (David Hirtle is the alternate for NRC.) <sandro> RESOLVED: publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just agreed to <PaulaP> no urgent issues csma: AOB? ... propose to adjourn <PaulaP> +1 <sandro> +1 adjourn +1 <AxelPolleres> +1 <PaulaP> bye Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Axel to send a list with small edits by tomorrow night [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action05] [NEW] ACTION: Axel to send another mail with issues "to be considered" and add it to the wiki within 2 weeks [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action07] [NEW] ACTION: AxelP to email the list per some small edit for the doc by July 5 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action06] [NEW] ACTION: csma and Chris Welty to solve the SPARQL liaison problem [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: csma to ack Frank to do the modification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: on DavidH to add the three items to the consider/document issue list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action03] [NEW] ACTION: on Frank to remove the complain models, requirement from the interoperability diagram [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action04] [End of minutes] Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.127 (CVS log) $Date: 2006/07/04 15:58:05 $ Scribe.perl diagnostic output [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2006 16:25:46 UTC