Re: Fwd: Appeal of the WG Chairs on the draft DiD Working Group charter

The latest proposed charter did not receive objections, so this 
objection is now considered resolved.

  see https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/376


On 2/5/2024 10:16 AM, Philippe Le Hégaret wrote:
> From
> 
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-did-wg/2023Jul/0000.html
> 
> (resent here since this is context information for an ongoing Council)
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Appeal of the WG Chairs on the draft DiD Working Group charter
> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:23:17 -0400
> From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
> To: Joe Andrieu <joe@legreq.com>
> CC: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>, Pierre-Antoine Champin 
> <pierre-antoine@w3.org>, public-did-wg@w3.org
> 
> Context: Joe Andrieu requested to file an appeal on the DID WG chairs 
> decision to merge some changes in the charter proposal to be submitted 
> to AC review. Joe argues that this charter does not reflect the 
> consensus of the WG. The chairs, on the other hand, argue that 1) while 
> there is indeed no clear consensus, this charter is the most acceptable 
> for the majority of the group (an assessment that was confirmed by a 
> recent poll); and that 2) the charter is not a WG deliverable, and 
> consensus must be reached at the AC level anyway, so Joe’s argument 
> should be raised during AC review, not prior to it.
> 
> 
> Dear Joe,
> 
> In response to your appeal (sent to Pierre-Antoine Champin and me on 
> April 12, 2023), and in light of the discussions we had with you, with 
> the DID Working Group chairs, and of the results of the poll sent to the 
> DID Working Group on May 22, 2023 [1].
> 
> While the W3C team concurs there is no consensus within the Working 
> Group, we reached the conclusion that the best way forward for the 
> Working Group is to submit the charter proposal, in its current state 
> [2], to the Advisory Committee for review, per section 4.3 Advisory 
> Committee Review of a Charter [3]. We will clearly signal that there is 
> dissent among the participants of the Working Group, and encourage all 
> members (including those disagreeing participants) to discuss these 
> issues as part of the AC review. We expect that the charter proposal may 
> further evolve during this discussion, and hope that the end result will 
> be acceptable to all members.
> 
> Philippe Le Hegaret,
> W3C Strategy and Project Lead
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/117488/rechartering_survey/results
> [2] https://w3c.github.io/did-wg-charter/
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20230612/#CharterReview
> 
> On 4/12/2023 6:20 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
>> Pierra-Antoine,
>>
>> As team contact, I am officially asking for an appeal to the decision 
>> by the WG chairs.
>>
>> The required information is published publicly at 
>> https://blog.joeandrieu.com/2023/04/12/fighting-for-consensus-at-the-w3c/ <https://blog.joeandrieu.com/2023/04/12/fighting-for-consensus-at-the-w3c/>
>>
>> I look forward to hearing from the Director.
>

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2024 23:45:59 UTC