- From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:45:18 -0700
- To: public-review-comments@w3.org
The latest proposed charter did not receive objections, so this
objection is now considered resolved.
see https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/376
On 2/5/2024 10:25 AM, Philippe Le Hégaret wrote:
> This was a message sent to the Team on September 9, 2023.
>
> (resent here since this is context information for an ongoing Council)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [Organization] formally objects to Staff advancing the
> proposed recharter for the Decentralized Identifiers Working Group
> ("DID-WG") to AC-review without seeking DID-WG consensus with the
> weakest objections. As a result the AC-review sees a proposed charter
> that harms the DID-WG's ability to get a fair review.
>
> We formally object to the Chairs of DID-WG not seeking consensus with
> the weakest objections, including not holding any meetings on the
> topic, and dismissing concerns by instead labeling them a matter for
> AC-review.
>
> We formally object to W3C Staff refusing to advance Joe Andrieu's
> April 12th 2023 appeal (which would be a formal objection under the
> current process document).
>
> We also agree with claims in invited expert Christopher Allen's formal
> objection, Joe Andrieu's April 12th 2023 appeal (submitted under a prior
> process and identified under the current process as a formal
> objection), and Joe Andrieu's September 8th 2023 formal objection. These
> formal objections include more problems with venue and process, due to
> not seeking consensus. In addition, invited expert Kaliya Young
> (formerly Hamlin) expressed her support of Joe Andrieu's process
> appeal, and she too is now silenced by this shift to the AC.
>
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2024 23:45:20 UTC