- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:53:26 -0400
- To: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- CC: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 6/17/2013 5:32 PM, Duncan Bayne wrote: >> Yes, it is probably more a marketing term. It appears to mean content >> that is owned by people that invested a great deal in creating the >> content and therefore are highly focused on getting a return on their >> investment. > My concern with the term is that it implies a hierarchy of value - with > that type of content (basically, Hollywood movies and expensive TV > shows) at the top. I don't think it's language we should be using. > We could call it expensive content.
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 00:53:33 UTC