- From: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:07:53 +1000
- To: "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 01:08:23 UTC
No, because not all expensive content is DRM-controlled. -- Duncan Bayne ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: duncan_bayne I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me at the above number. ----- Reply message ----- From: "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org> To: "Duncan Bayne" <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm> Cc: <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org> Subject: "Premium content" Date: Tue, Jun 18, 2013 10:53 AM On 6/17/2013 5:32 PM, Duncan Bayne wrote: >> Yes, it is probably more a marketing term. It appears to mean content >> that is owned by people that invested a great deal in creating the >> content and therefore are highly focused on getting a return on their >> investment. > My concern with the term is that it implies a hierarchy of value - with > that type of content (basically, Hollywood movies and expensive TV > shows) at the top. I don't think it's language we should be using. > We could call it expensive content.
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 01:08:23 UTC