- From: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:38:28 +0200
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 2013/06/18 02:53, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > On 6/17/2013 5:32 PM, Duncan Bayne wrote: >>> Yes, it is probably more a marketing term. It appears to mean >>> content >>> that is owned by people that invested a great deal in creating the >>> content and therefore are highly focused on getting a return on their >>> investment. >> My concern with the term is that it implies a hierarchy of value - >> with >> that type of content (basically, Hollywood movies and expensive TV >> shows) at the top. I don't think it's language we should be using. >> > We could call it expensive content. I don't think we should call it anything other than what it is: content (or video content). The publishers desire to restrict the visitor's possible actions regarding the content doesn't make it "premium" or even expensive. -- Emmanuel Revah http://manurevah.com
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:38:56 UTC