Re: "Premium content"

How about 'DRM-controlled content' then? Avoids both the implication of quality, and also skirts around the restriction / rights debate. 

--
Duncan Bayne
ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: duncan_bayne

----- Reply message -----
From: "Mark Watson" <watsonm@netflix.com>
To: "Duncan Bayne" <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
Cc: <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Subject: "Premium content"
Date: Tue, Jun 18, 2013 8:04 AM
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> It would be nice to have a short commonly agreed term for "content the

> licensing terms for which include a requirement for DRM".



If the requirement is for DRM - as opposed to other technologies, how

about 'restricted content?'

I don't especially mind - I think arguing about what the R standards for in DRM is silly, for example - but there could be people who would object to "restricted" for essentially the same (or I suppose inverse) reason that you object to "premium".

Also, there is the problem of distinguishing between legal restrictions (license terms) and technical restrictions (DRM).
...Mark 



--

Duncan Bayne

ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype:

duncan_bayne



I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours.  If there's something

urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me at the above number.